UNEP
Launches Peoples’ Climate Pledge Tracker
Copenhagen,
11 December 2009 People across the globe can track the proposals
and plans of countries to combat climate change via an online
'climate pledge tracker', launched today by the UN Environment
Programme (UNEP).
The
'tracker', which is being updated as new proposals are made
during the UN climate convention meeting in Copenhagen,
compares and consolidates all the national pledges made
so far with the scientific goal of getting the world at
or under a 2 degree Celsius rise compared to pre-industrial
levels.
Experts
estimate that what is needed is to bring emissions of greenhouse
gases down to 44 billion tonnes (44Gt) of CO2 equivalent
by 2020 in order to give the world a 50 percent chance of
meeting that temperature target.
After
2020, emissions need to be cut to 16 billion tonnes (16
Gt) of CO2 equivalent in 2050. Meeting a 1.5 degree Celsius
goal, which some countries are calling for, will require
even more ambitious emissions reductions over the next 40
years.
Achim
Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director,
said: "The eyes of the world are on the UN climate
convention conference in Copenhagen. With this tracker,
everyone within the conference and beyond can from their
office or living room monitor the ambition of governments
to Seal a convincing Deal by 18 December."
The
tracker currently has pledges and proposals from 25 countries
plus the European Union's 27 member states. Eleven of the
25 countries are from developing economies ranging from
China and India to Costa Rica and the Maldives. It includes
recent proposals from countries such as South Africa, India
and Kazakhstan.
The
tracker currently estimates that if the most ambitious existing
pledges were fully implemented, including with financial
support for developing economies, the world might achieve
emissions reductions of 47.5 billion tonnes by 2020.
This
indicates a gap of around 3.5 billion tonnes which needs
to be bridged by the 18 December when the climate convention
conference is scheduled to end.
The
figure, which has a margin of error of plus or minus two
billion tonnes, is within the range of a study, released
by Lord Stern and UNEP on 6 December, indicating that the
gap is between 1 billion tonnes and five billion tonnes
of CO2 equivalent.
It
also supports a statement released today by the European
Climate Foundation/ Climate Works/Project Catalyst and others
including UNEP; the Grantham Research Institute on Climate
Change and the Environment and Ecofys, saying that the analysis
by leading independent institutions point in the same direction
an agreement that puts the world on track to limiting global
warming to 2 degrees Celsius or lower is possible in Copenhagen.
The
tracker, which will continue after Copenhagen, also looks
at the emissions reduction pledges up to 2050 where scientists
estimate that global greenhouse gas emissions need to be
down to 16 billion tonnes (16 Gt) of C02 equivalent.
Notes to Editors:
The Climate Pledge Tracker can be accessed at www.unep.org/climatepledges
Nick Nuttall, UNEP Spokesperson and Head of Media
Copenhagen
Must Deliver Emissions Cuts at or Beyond Current Proposals
to Keep Below 2 Degrees
Joint
Statement from the Grantham Research Institute on Climate
Change and the Environment, the United Nations Environment
Programme, Ecofys, Climate Analytics, the Sustainability
Institute, the European Climate Foundation and ClimateWorks.
Recent
independent analyses of current mitigation proposals on
the table in Copenhagen by Nicholas Stern, the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP), the Potsdam Institute for
Climate Impact Research (PIK), Ecofys, Climate Analytics,
the Sustainability Institute (C-ROADS), the European Climate
Foundation and ClimateWorks (Project Catalyst) all point
to the same conclusion: the negotiations must deliver the
high-end of current proposals, and stretch beyond them,
if the world is to have a reasonable chance of containing
warming to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, or
the 1.5°C goal of many developing nations.
Copenhagen,
9 December 2009 - There is a narrow window of opportunity
to have the possibility of achieving the global political
and scientific consensus of avoiding a global warming of
more than 2°C above pre-industrial levels or the 1.5°C
goal of 100 developing nations. The concentrations of greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere is increasing everyday and, without
significant reductions in emissions, will soon reach levels
at which the consequent changes in the Earth's climate will
have very serious, and potentially disastrous and irreversible,
impacts.
Research
papers and analysis released in the past few days by several
of the leading independent authorities on the question have
looked at the impact of the current proposals made by countries
at the Copenhagen Climate Summit. While there are differences
in the details of the findings, the overall messages from
these studies are clear:
1.
To have a reasonable chance of limiting global warming to
2°C, or lower,, action at the high-end of current proposals
and beyond will be required. This means that the global
deal needs a clear commitment to go significantly above
the most ambitious targets currently under discussion, and
hence stretch above those in the next ten days negotiations.
2.
Such an agreement is possible; the levels of reduction required
are both technically and economically feasible - what is
required is the political will and leadership to lock-in
these commitments in Copenhagen.
3.
Achieving the high-end of the proposed reduction range,
and beyond, will also require strong financial and technology
support for developing countries.
4.
If achieved, such an agreement would be a historic step
forward and keep hope alive that the world can contain long-term
global warming to below 2 or 1.5 degrees. If anything less
than the high-end of current proposals plus significant
additional reductions is achieved, then climate risks will
be higher and it may not be possible to catch-up later -
we may miss the window of opportunity.
5.
But Copenhagen is only the beginning of a journey - even
if the high-end of current proposals plus additional reductions
are locked-in, more work will be required. Each of the studies
show that a gap in mitigation may remain after Copenhagen
against 2020 requirements. It is thus essential that a Copenhagen
agreement also include a "review and strengthen"
clause where countries review progress against the latest
scientific evidence and continue to adjust their commitments
accordingly; the first such review should end no later than
2015 and draw upon the next assessment of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, due for conclusion in 2014.
"A
deal that puts us on the path to having a good chance of
avoiding warming of 2 degrees, is possible - but the proposals
on the table are not quite there . We need to capture the
high-end of those proposals and more in Copenhagen, and
then continue to ratchet-up commitments over time. We have
a historic opportunity in Copenhagen to increase climate
security and economic security for the world for generations
to come."
Do United Nations Environment Programme