13/12/2005
- Environmental, women’s, health and consumer organisations
expressed disappointment that EU ministers failed today
to seize a unique opportunity to protect people and the
environment from the threat of toxic chemicals.
The Council rejected a crucial principle
adopted last month by the European Parliament: the requirement
to substitute hazardous chemicals with safer alternatives
whenever possible. Although chemical producers would be
required to ‘assess’ substitutes for a hazardous chemical,
decision-makers will still have to grant an authorisation
under an ‘adequate control’ procedure, even if safer alternatives
are available. This loophole represents little change
from the current, flawed system, which has failed to control
the most dangerous chemicals and hinders safe, innovative
products from entering the market.
The Council strengthened substitution
requirements for persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals,
which represent only a fraction of all hazardous chemicals.
However, Member States left the door open for carcinogens,
chemicals that are toxic to reproduction (e.g. the phthalate
DEHP) and hormone-disrupting substances (e.g. bisphenol
A) to stay on the market, even if safer alternatives exist.
The Council also voted to drastically
reduce safety data that chemical producers would be obliged
to supply, particularly for substances produced in low
quantities. Thousands of chemicals could thus stay on
the market, despite no health information being available.
This, too, undermines the likelihood of identifying safer
alternatives. Scandals such as the recent contamination
of baby milk in Europe by a potentially hazardous chemical
will continue to happen as long as we lack important safety
data.
It is essential that the Parliament
reaffirms its support for ‘mandatory substitution’ at
the Second Reading, next year. This would make sure that,
among other benefits, REACH delivers savings worth €90
billion over 30 years in the cost of treating key occupational
diseases due to chemical contamination. After four years
of REACH being watered down under chemical industry pressure,
putting into practice a strong substitution obligation
is the most important opportunity left to address the
growing toxic chemical contamination and to ensure that
human health and the environment are given the necessary
protection. |