16/03/2006 - The Environment Agency has prosecuted Sea Containers
Property Limited for breaching its sewage treatment consent
levels at a former college its owns in Arundel, West Sussex.
Sea Containers Property Services Limited appeared before
Chichester Magistrates Court on Wednesday 15 March 2006
and pleaded guilty to the offence that took place in July
2005. The company was fined £2,000 and ordered to
pay costs of £858.50 to the Environment Agency.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) is a measure of the amount
of oxygen taken up by bacteria living in the effluent once
it enters a watercourse and at high levels aquatic life
can suffocate. Raw domestic sewage has a BOD level of 300-350mg/l.
Suspended solids interfere with fish gills and can smother
river life.
Under Section 85(6) of the Water Resources Act 1991, Sea
Containers Property Ltd has a consent that allows the property
to discharge treated sewage effluent into the River Arun
as long as the BOD level does not exceed 40mg/l and the
suspended solids 60mg/l. The effluent is sampled regularly
during the year to make sure the company is complying with
the consent and that no pollution to the river is caused.
The Court heard that on 12 July 2005 an Environment Agency
Officer visited the New England College to take samples
from the private sewage treatment works on site. When analysed
this showed the BOD level to be 133mg/l and the suspended
solids level to be 169mg/l. This meant that the BOD level
was almost half the strength of raw sewage and it was over
three times the agreed consent, as was the suspended solids
level.
In mitigation, Sea Containers Property Services Ltd said
that since the incident occurred maintenance checks at the
treatment plant have increased from once per annum to four
times a year.
They had also previously requested that residents did not
dispose of non-biodegradable waste, such as sanitary products,
via the sewerage system but these warnings were ignored.
The company also did not profit financially in any away
from this incident and regretted the potential for harm
to be caused to the environment.
Commenting on the case, Environment Management Officer
Fay Baldry said: "The discharge from the sewage treatment
plant has been an ongoing issue that we had been trying
to get resolved for a long time. The company had been warned
and given sufficient time to rectify the problems but failed
to do so.
"As a last resort we will take enforcement action
when required to protect the environment. This is unacceptable
and shows that the company has no regard for its responsibility
to the environment." |