Head Office Press Office - 01-Mar-2007 - The Environment
Agency is joining a coalition of government bodies aiming
to protect UK plants and animals from invasive species such
as Floating Pennywort and Topmouth Gudgeon.
Consultation to refine the Governments Invasive Non-Native
Species Framework Strategy will focus on stopping further
incursions from non-native species and limiting any negative
impact from those already established, by:
§ Prevention: to reduce the risk of invasive non-native
species being introduced;
§ Early detection, surveillance and monitoring: ensuring
effective mechanisms are developed so that invasive threats
can be responded to quickly;
§ Control and eradication: finding the best solution
and identifying the right approach in the case of each species;
§ Raising awareness: ensuring that the public is aware
of invasive non-native issues;
§ Research: ensuring that there is up to date information
on the threats posed by these species, and the best methods
to tackle them.
§ Legislative framework: ensuring that current and
any future legislation can adequately guard against the
negative impacts;
Head of Conservation Paul Raven said the technical expertise
of the Environment Agency in dealing with problems posed
within river systems in particular, would play an important
role in counteracting the impact of non-native species.
"The Environment Agency’s remit involves elements
of detection, control, research and public awareness of
non-native species that have already reached Britain, and
it’s hoped this new framework will improve collaboration
between organisations and individuals across the country,"
said Dr Raven.
"While our main concern is the detrimental effect
that non-native species can have on our native wildlife
and habitats, some can also have an impact on agriculture,
fisheries and flood risk management.
"We’ve identified 70 non-native species that hinder
our work with 36 being a particular problem."
Examples of current Invasive Species concerns for the Environment
Agency include:
potential flooding problems caused by floating pennywort
clogging up drainage channels;
river banks being undermined by signal crayfish and Chinese
mitten crabs;
increased flooding risk as a result of dense growth of Japanese
knotweed along river banks;
signal crayfish displacing and killing native crayfish by
carrying a deadly fungal disease;
topmouth gudgeon displacing native fish in lakes;
changes in the biological make-up of rivers as new species
invade;
spread of Japanese knotweed as a result of disposal of soil
as waste;
the impact of mink on water vole numbers.
A recent study carried out in England has shown that there
are 2,721 non-native species in England, of which 1,798
(66%) are plants.
Complete eradication is often too expensive and impractical.
For example it has been estimated that it would cost £1.56billion
to eradicate Japanese Knotweed (an invasive non-native weed)
alone.
The consultation will run until 23rd May 2007.
Case Study:
Floating Pennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides)
The Environment Agency has just announced funding of £20,000
to help control this extremely fast growing aquatic plant
on the River Soar around the City of Leicester. It first
appeared on the Soar upstream of Leicester in 2004 and during
2005 spread extensively - choking the river and its tributaries
within the city. Leicester City Council worked hard with
volunteers to remove the invasive species by hand, but by
2006 Floating Pennywort had spread extensively downstream
from Leicester, with a large growth spurt in autumn 2006.
This is only the third Floating Pennywort outbreak ever
targeted with funding, with the others being in Devon and
the East Anglian region. Half of the £20,000 funding
will go to Leicester City Council and half to British Waterways.
Environment Agency Midlands ecologist Phil Harding said:
"floating pennywort was the one invasive species we
really didn’t want to get. It’s quite an awesome plant which
can grow 20cm a day."
The preferred approach to managing floating pennywort is
to manually remove the weed and possibly use a herbicide.
"Unfortunately I don’t think it’s possible to totally
eradicate the species using these methods, we can simply
manage the problem."
But work now being carried out at the Centre for Ecology
and Hydrology using a biological control shows promising
signs.
An initial study of the Argentinean weevil Listronotus
elongatus shows the insect specifically eats floating pennywort
and vitally, completes its entire lifecycle on the species.
Head Aquatic Plant Management Group, Jonathan Newman, said
both the larvae and adult form of the species consume the
weed, which then dries out and dies.
"The two main things that you look for in a biological
control is that the species completes its entire lifecycle
on the invasive weed and won’t eat other native species,"
Dr Newman said.
"There is still work to be carried out on a number
of native plants, but the results so far are promising."
Background: Originally from North America and was brought
to Britain in the 1980s as a plant for tropical aquaria
and garden ponds. However by 1991 it had become present
in the wild.
Problem: Grows in shallow, slow-flowing eutrophic water
bodies, floating pennywort forms dense interwoven mats of
vegetation that extend up to 40cm above the water surface
and up to 50cm below. These mats quickly cover the water
surface and can grow 20cm per day, starving the waterbody
of light, nutrients and oxygen which kills many of the species
living in it and also increases the risk of flooding by
blocking the waterway.
Physical description: Has circular or kidney-shaped, deeply
lobed leaves, up to 180mm across. The stem is horizontal
with a fleshy appearance and has leaf stalks and roots every
0.2-0.3m. It has no flowers and can double its weight in
as little as 3 days.
Where found: Relatively restricted to about 35 sites in
the south of England and south Wales. It is very likely
to spread around UK watercourses and become a major nuisance
in the future.
Treatment: Manual removal plus use a herbicide containing
Glyphosphate or 2,4-D amine, followed by cutting and removing
the weed 2-3 weeks later. Very difficult to control due
to its rapid growth rates. The use of an approved herbicide
in or near water requires the prior written approval of
the Environment Agency.