Panorama
 
 
 
 
 

MEETING OF MINE SADC MINISTERS
RESPONSIBLE FOR TOURISM AND ENVIRONMENT


Environmental Panorama
International
February of 2008


12 February 2008 - Media Statement - Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism - TUESDAY, 12 FEBRUARY 2008: The development of infrastructure and the investment in Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCA’s) is gaining momentum. Ministers and senior officials from Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe met yesterday in Gauteng. They discussed the progress in the implementation of the TFCA development strategy for 2010 and beyond.

The strategy, which was endorsed by the Ministers in 2005, is designed to position TFCAs as Southern Africa’s premier tourism destination. The following issues were discussed at the meeting:

The development of a strategic brand for TFCAs. This brand will be launched on 10 May 2008 in Durban, South Africa. It will form the basis for awareness / advocacy campaigns and the active marketing of TFCAs.

The development of an investment catalogue which will be a guide containing important information for potential investors such as why invest in TFCAs, how to invest in TFCAs, investment opportunities, investment incentives and contact information.

The hosting of a TFCA Investment Conference on 20-21 October 2008 at the Sandton Convention Centre in South Africa with the aim to market investment opportunities in TFCAs.

The ministers expressed concern at the ecological damage caused to beaches and other environmentally sensitive areas by quad bikes and 4x4s mainly from South Africa. The regulation of such activities in South Africa has resulted in more pressures on ecologically sensitive areas in neighboring countries. They asked South Africa to assist in putting a stop to this damaging activity. It’s being considered to develop a protocol for the region to manage or regulate these activities.

There was also further agreement on the need to prioritise conservation issues such as:

Wildlife exchange programmes and translocation
Cross-border research programmes.
Ministers however raised concern about the process of implementing the UNIVISA as it has a direct impact on the success of TFCAs in terms of facilitating the easy flow of tourists in the region.

In conclusion, these countries agreed on the need to work together in promoting ecotourism and the conservation of natural resources. The ministers will meet again in a near future to discuss progress in addressing these issues.
Mava Scott (Acting Chief Director: Communications)

STATEMENT BY THE OFFICE OF MARTHINUS VAN SCHALKWYK, MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS & TOURISM, ON 5 FEBRUARY 2008

The Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Mr. Marthinus van Schalkwyk, has considered the appeals lodged against the Department’s decision to grant an environmental authorisation of the construction of a Peaking Power Plant at the Avon Site in the Shakaskraal area, KwaZulu-Natal.

After evaluating all the appeals and relevant information submitted to him, the Minister has come to a decision, a copy of which is attached hereto.

APPEAL DECISION

APPEALS AGAINST THE ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PEAKING POWER PLANT AT THE AVON SITE IN THE SHAKASKRAAL AREA, KWAZULU NATAL

1. INTRODUCTION
In terms of section 22 of the Environment Conservation Act (ECA), 1989, read with the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations published in Government Notice No. R 1182 of 5 September 1997, the Director-General of the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) on 14 September 2007 authorised the Department of Minerals and Energy (DME) to proceed with preparations for the construction of a peaking power plant on the abovementioned site. After the Record of Decision had been issued, two appeals were lodged against this authorisation.

2. BACKGROUND
A peaking power plant is generally run only during periods of peak demand for electricity but it may also be activated when other power plants are under maintenance or in exceptional circumstances when the security of the grid supply is threatened. By necessity, it must be possible to bring such a plant to its maximum production capacity in a very short time. Therefore, the generators of a peaking power plant are driven by Open Cycle Gas Turbines (OCGT) which are fuelled by either diesel or kerosene and at full load it is expected to produce 900 MW of electricity. At this production rate it is anticipated to consume approximately 225 tons of fuel per hour. A plant of this nature is expected to operate on average only 10% of the time during its life span.

It is obvious that generation of electricity by means of OCGTs is extremely costly. It is imperative, therefore, that peaking power plants be situated at as low an altitude as possible to allow the plants to operate at maximum efficiency. Furthermore, close proximity to existing Eskom infrastructure and to sources of fuel are also important considerations in the location of these plants. Hence, this plant will be located approximately 65 km north of Durban and about 8 km inland from the coastline, adjacent to Eskom’s existing Avon substation.

The peaking power plant will be operated by an independent power producer who will be decided upon by means of competitive bidding processes.

3. APPEALS

Two appeals opposing the decision of the Director-General were lodged in terms of section 35(3) of the ECA. The following emerged as the major grounds of appeal:

a) As an industrial undertaking which will be privately operated for profit, the plant should be located within an officially designated industrial area.
b) The provisions for the control of emissions are insufficient. Stack emissions should be continuously monitored.
c) The plant should have been located closer to the fuel source or, alternatively, within close proximity to a rail link to allow fuel delivery by means of rail transport. This will alleviate the impact of heavy duty traffic on affected residential areas.
d) An increase in criminal activities especially during the construction phase is anticipated.
e) The impact of the proposed development on the values of properties in the area was inaccurately assessed.
f) The large quantity of highly combustible fuel stored on the site will represent a severe hazard in an area where sugar cane is regularly burned under controlled conditions.
g) News of the development will cause an influx of job seekers.

4. DECISION

In reaching my decision I have considered the documents and other information listed below:

a) The record of decision (ROD), reference number 12/12/20/710 dated 14 September 2007 and the documents associated therewith.
b) The appeals lodged by the two appellants.
c) The comments by Environmental Impact Management Services on behalf of the applicant (Department of Minerals and Energy) regarding the appeals.

I am satisfied that the decision made by the Director-General in the original ROD was the correct decision. Hence, in terms of section 35(4) of the Environment Conservation Act, 1989 (Act 73 of 1989), I have decided to dismiss the appeals lodged against the decision to authorise the construction of the peaking power plant at the Avon site in the Shakaskraal area in KwaZulu Natal. The reasons for my decision are, inter alia, as follows:

a) The Director-General adequately considered the major anticipated environmental impacts of the proposed development before making the decision. The mitigation measures proposed in the EIR and the management actions recommended in the environmental management plan (EMP) go a long way towards reducing the impact of the plant.
b) Both appellants raised the location of the plant as a major ground of appeal, indicating that it would have been more appropriate for it to be situated in a designated industrial area and not in an agricultural area as is currently proposed. However, this is a planning decision which will have to be taken in terms of planning legislation based on physical planning considerations. This falls outside the purview of environmental impact legislation and, hence, is beyond my decision making competence. In my view the proposed location is fully acceptable in terms of the relevant environmental considerations.
c) Both appellants accepted the comments and explanations of the applicant on the other issues raised in their appeals.
d) There is a dire need for the development of peaking power plants to ensure a stable supply of electricity to the country as a whole.

MARTHINUS VAN SCHALKWYK, MP
MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND TOURISM

+ More

17 Arrested, 2 Super Ducks Confiscated as Authorities Swoop Down on Poachers

14 February 2008 - Media Statement - Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism - THURSDAY, 14 FEBRUARY 2008: Authorities have shown the might of collaborative enforcement against poaching and illegal diving as officials from the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) and the South African Police Services (SAPS) swooped down on alleged poachers when they arrested 17 suspects in two separate incidents during the early hours of this morning, Thursday 14 February 2008, in Hout Bay and Robben Island respectively.

As the diving ban regulations, which were Gazetted on 1 February 2008, entered its third week of enforcement, a total of fifteen alleged poachers were arrested on Robben Island during a night-long operation. Robben Island is one of four areas where a total ban on diving has been placed as part of measures for the protection of wild abalone and to promote the recovery and rebuilding of the resource.

The fifteen suspects were finally brought to Cape Town harbour earlier this morning (14 February 2008) after officials from DEAT and SAPS took up position on and around the Island throughout the night to ensure the arrest of all the suspects.
When the suspects realized their boat was taken over by law enforcement officials, they swam to the island where they attempted to hide.
As officers were positioned on land and at sea, the presence of a dispatched police helicopter to Robben Island added air positioning as well.

All the suspects were arrested by 9h00 this morning.

A super duck, 77 abalone and abalone shucking equipment were confiscated.

In terms of the regulations for the protection of wild abalone, gazetted on 1 February 2008, a penalty of up to R500 000,00 or a prison sentence of up to two years can be imposed for failure to comply with the regulations.

In a separate incident, almost at the same time at around 01h30, another super duck was confiscated at the Hout Bay harbour after law enforcement officials monitored two men entering the harbour with a super duck, presumably intending to poach.

The skipper was arrested in accordance Merchant Shipping Act. The second suspect was arrested for an outstanding warrant of arrest linked to another abalone poaching case.
Carol Moses

+ More

Tourism is a Strong Pillar to Economic Growth

13 February 2008 - Media Statement - Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism - WEDNESDAY, 13 FEBRUARY 2008: “Grow tourism using proven draw-cards such as entertainment, leisure, wildlife, culture, business, religion and agricultural pillars,” the Deputy Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Ms Rejoice Mabudafhasi told delegates at the Regional and International Tourism Conference in Algeria on 11th February 2008. The conference drew to a close yesterday, 12th February 2008.

The Deputy Minister commended the existence of strong rewarding partnerships between the government, the private sector, community and the labour movements in South Africa. She emphasized that if correct marketing fundamentals are in place, tourism can achieve its vision of being a key contributor to the intended 6% annual economic growth in South Africa and will have similar effects in other African states.

Ms Rejoice Mabudafhasi advised her African counterparts to give top priority to quality assurance of the tourism facilities and ensure that tourist destinations are safe and secure. She called for compliance institutions to be set up and cited the South African Tourism Grading Council as a shining example in this regard for ensuring that minimum standards are set and compliance monitored. This has resulted in high satisfaction levels among tourists visiting South Africa as they keep on coming back.

The Deputy Minister also welcomed the achievements of the goals set for Sho’t Left, a campaign aimed at encouraging over 5.1 million South Africans with resources and the desire to travel to first travel to a variety of affordable and easily accessible local holiday destinations. Tourism Indaba, Welcome Campaign and Emerging Tourism Entrepreneur of the Year Award (ETEYA) will be pursued vigorously to promote the culture of local travelling. Ms Mabudafhasi urged the delegates to develop similar campaigns in their respective countries to boost tourism promotion.

Ms Mabudafhasi informed the conference that South Africa wants to increase the number of foreign arrivals to 10 million during the 2010 Soccer World Cup to be hosted locally.
Advertising agreements concluded with National Geographic Channel, NBC, BBC World, showcasing vibrant urban destinations such as Johannesburg and Cape Town to a truly global audience will be the vehicle used to reach this target. SA is following a consistent strategy to increase awareness of her products to the UK, France, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, Asia, Africa and the US markets. Marketing budget has been increased by 40% specifically to target the Europe market.

Through these marketing initiatives, South African tourism has made an overall contribution of 8.3% to the GDP from over 8 million arrivals in 2007. This has boosted our economy to the tune of R57.3 billion which resulted in job creation and eradication of poverty.

For a copy of the Deputy Minister’s speech click on the link below http://www.deat.gov.za/NewsMedia/Speeches/2008Feb11/08022008.pdf

For more information regarding the Regional and International Tourism Conference in Algeria as well as to interview the Deputy Minister please feel free to contact:
Moses Rannditsheni

 
 

Source: New Zealand - Ministry for the Environment
Press consultantship
All rights reserved

 
 
 
 

 

Universo Ambiental  
 
 
 
 
     
SEJA UM PATROCINADOR
CORPORATIVO
A Agência Ambiental Pick-upau busca parcerias corporativas para ampliar sua rede de atuação e intensificar suas propostas de desenvolvimento sustentável e atividades que promovam a conservação e a preservação dos recursos naturais do planeta.

 
 
 
 
Doe Agora
Destaques
Biblioteca
     
Doar para a Agência Ambiental Pick-upau é uma forma de somar esforços para viabilizar esses projetos de conservação da natureza. A Agência Ambiental Pick-upau é uma organização sem fins lucrativos, que depende de contribuições de pessoas físicas e jurídicas.
Conheça um pouco mais sobre a história da Agência Ambiental Pick-upau por meio da cronologia de matérias e artigos.
O Projeto Outono tem como objetivo promover a educação, a manutenção e a preservação ambiental através da leitura e do conhecimento. Conheça a Biblioteca da Agência Ambiental Pick-upau e saiba como doar.
             
       
 
 
 
 
     
TORNE-SE UM VOLUNTÁRIO
DOE SEU TEMPO
Para doar algumas horas em prol da preservação da natureza, você não precisa, necessariamente, ser um especialista, basta ser solidário e desejar colaborar com a Agência Ambiental Pick-upau e suas atividades.

 
 
 
 
Compromissos
Fale Conosco
Pesquise
     
Conheça o Programa de Compliance e a Governança Institucional da Agência Ambiental Pick-upau sobre políticas de combate à corrupção, igualdade de gênero e racial, direito das mulheres e combate ao assédio no trabalho.
Entre em contato com a Agência Ambiental Pick-upau. Tire suas dúvidas e saiba como você pode apoiar nosso trabalho.
O Portal Pick-upau disponibiliza um banco de informações ambientais com mais de 35 mil páginas de conteúdo online gratuito.
             
       
 
 
 
 
 
Ajude a Organização na conservação ambiental.